Showing posts with label book preview. Show all posts
Showing posts with label book preview. Show all posts

Monday, October 28, 2013

Directing Your Digital Fate: Douglas Rushkoff's Program or be Programmed: Ten Commands for a Digital Age

I've heard conflicting opinions about the healthiness vs. usefulness of internet immersion, and have consequently felt guilty about all the time I spend online and been hesitant to immerse myself even more. Rushkoff’s book  Program or Be Programmed: Ten Commands for a Digital Age has a good reader rating on Amazon and is about the best ways to digitally immerse ourselves, so I'm checking it out.

After skimming this book, I see that the author focuses a lot on telling the reader the way humans work and the way the internet works in order to tell the humans how to make the internet work their way. This is reflected in the illustrations, whose main subjects are always human. Several of the chapters have italicized paragraphs at the beginning, which seem like a sort of abstract of the chapter.


Early Social Proof


When I posted on some social sites that I was reading this book, I asked, “What’s the best way to go about life & digital life in the Digital Age?” I received some responses on Facebook: my aunt and cousin “liked” the status, and my mom gave a couple of pieces of advice to answer that question. They were concerned with protecting one’s digital identity and reputation, with passwords and posting intelligently. While it wasn't quite the angle I’m looking at, her response does reflect the “be careful” attitude my family has about internet activity.

Similar Books

When I looked for similar books on Amazon and Google Books, both search engines recommended more of Rushkoff’s books. Amazon recommended three – Coercion: Why We Listen to What “They” Say; Life, Inc.: How Corporatism Conquered the World, and How WE Can Take It Back; and Present Shock: When Everything Happens Now.” Google Books just included the latter. Present Shock also happens to be more current that the book I’m reading; it was published in this year, whereas the other was published in 2011. It seems to delve further into the “command” of one of the chapters in Program or be Programmed: “Do Not Be Always On.” Other books the engines recommended are also about the psychology of the internet, how business can use the internet and how corporations have taken over the internet; and even Unbored: The Essential Field Guide to Serious Fun.

 Who Cares?

When searching for this book and its author on Twitter, I found several mentions of Rushkoff and his book from people in several countries and of several backgrounds. Usually, though, their backgrounds had something to do with computers or brand marketing. There were also YouTube links to the author’s presentations about the book’s message, and links to a couple of interview articles. When searching on Facebook, I found a fan page for the book which is not very active and has 268 likes (now 269, with my like). However, there were several interesting articles posted, which told me that Rushkoff publicly took himself off of Facebook, and also that computer ignorance is a threat to personal freedoms, since technical ignorance is being exploited in courtrooms. I shared that article on my Facebook page and on Google+. There was also a Facebook page with this book’s name, which mostly had programmer jokes.

On Google+, I mostly found links to Rushkoff’s work but I also found further explorations of the concept in education and even medicine. Recommendations of his work were generally more thoughtful than those on Twitter, since there is more space to speak on Google +. For example, John Wohn wrote four paragraphs about the book, beginning with, “Don't be put off by the title; Rushkoff is not (exactly) saying that everyone needs to be a Java programmer.” I even found a meme.

Aside from giving me more links to purchase the book and visit the author’s web site, Diigo gave me more interviews with Rushkoff and more blog posts about it, including one from a venture capitalist that mentioned that companies are desperate for programmers. Through Diigo results, I also learned that Rushkoff has helped start CodeAcademy, a free web-based site which teaches how to understand and write code.

Formal Reviews

I didn't find a formal review of Rushkoff’s book on our HBLL’s aggregate database, although I did find that he has written articles more than once for CNN. What I have seen so far tells me that he is very respected in his work and has several platforms to speak from. The closest thing to a formal review that I found was an enthusiastic blog-style review and interview article on Wired.com. 

Informal Reviews

The informal reviews I found critiqued the book and mainly found it to their liking. ChristianHumanist.org said that the book mainly asks “ten penetrating questions” rather than giving commands, which I think, based on what I’ve learned so far, is a great way to put it. I was glad to see in another article that there’s more to each “command” than its chapter title and a short summary, several versions of which I have already read in other articles. I also learned that this book won the “Neil Postman Award” (Neil Postman and Douglass Rushkoff are both Jewish and write about technology).

Course Inclusion

I found the syllabi from several classes which use Rushkoff’s book as a textbook. Some were a little surprising; though there were several computing classes requiring the book, it is also required in a writing class, a gaming class, and a major part of the Fall 2013 Introduction to Music Technology class at the University of Florida. One of the computing classes looks similar to a Digital Humanities web publishing class I’m currently taking, and I think including the book in that context would help incorporate more humanities skills in the course. 

Multimedia

There are several YouTube videos of Rushkoff speaking about the concepts of this book and of his other books. They range from a minute to over an hour. On Flickr, someone posted notes that they drew, perhaps at one of Rushkoff’s speeches. A phrase which intrigued me was “Companies should get their friends to friend each other.” Does this mean that companies should get their "friends"/competitors to network with each other?

First Impressions of the Book

On my first read of the book, I noticed Rushkoff's narrative of internet/media/human history. There’s one for nearly every “command.” Sure, the narrative is occasionally meladramatic and oversimplified – for example, “Until interactivity, we were defenseless emotional targets for the advertiser,” (Kindle Locations 293-294) – but it gets his point across and helps put the “command” into perspective.  His simplicity is one of the things which makes this book so accessible.

The point which was most novel to me was his explanation of how digital media has altered our thinking without most of us realizing it, valuing “the recent over the relevant” (Kindle Locations 361-362) and “offloading our thinking” (Kindle Location 382) and mental processes onto our computers and the Web. And by the way, the note above which mentioned companies' friends? It was saying that businesses should help their fans network with each other, to reinforce each others' patronizing of their business.

My Thinking So Far

I can understand why people recommend the book, and I look forward to reading it more in depth. I would like to examine more deeply the digital biases he points out, like the "choice filter" and attempting to be "always on" like the computer is. I'm not sure I agree with him on a section about how the digital world narrows our decisions in general, so I would like to look into that more. I might try to get my mom to listen to the audiobook so that we can discuss some of the concepts our family culture is more against, like sacrificing complete privacy for an online reputation.

Wednesday, October 23, 2013

Exploring George Orwell's 1984


I’m reading George Orwell’s 1984. I want to look specifically at “newspeak” and other ways Big Brother tries to control language to control people. I’d like to look at the spread of information in digital culture today and compare that with Big Brother’s suppression of information and texts.

Preview
I noticed the chapters do not have titles, and the book is divided into different sections. The lack of chapter names probably goes along with the bleak theme of the storyline and possibly the suppression of information and texts by Big Brother. There is the appendix at the end with The Principles of Newspeak. I started skimming the appendix, and there Orwell outlines the rules of Newspeak: the vocabulary, morphology, grammar, etc. Apparently Newspeak was created to diminish the overall English vocabulary and limit thought. I’m interested to see how Newspeak is actually used in the novel.

Early Social Proof
I put up a Facebook status on Tuesday morning telling my friends I was reading 1984, and I asked if they had read it or had any thoughts about it. I mentioned that I saw connections between Big Brother’s use of language and today’s politically correct language. I got a few thoughtful responses. My high school AP English teacher said, “The recent Snowden leaks about the NSA make me realize Big Brother is watching us at all times. We also are seeing the simplification of language. Have acronyms everywhere... Even shorter than contractions like "minipax." Torture was big a few years ago. Orwell was just 30 years ahead of his time.” A girl from my homeward said, “I think that the ‘perpetual war’ of 1984 is akin to the perpetual conflict between major political parties. It is a self-sustaining industry that keeps people busy and gives the impression of progress without really changing much.”

Similar Books
I searched Amazon and Google. Both sites recommended other books by George Orwell, but Amazon recommended some others that had similar themes to 1984. Amazon recommended Brave New World by Aldus Huxley, Lord of the Flies by William Golding, and Fahrenheit 451: A Novel by Ray Bradbury. Both Brave New World and Fahrenheit 451 are set in dystopian futures. The Lord of the Flies deals with the reality of the brutal aspects of human nature. All three books are cautionary tales about the possibilities of the future.

Who Cares?
I searched for “George Orwell 1984” on Facebook and Google+. Facebook informed me that 1,118,543 people “like this topic.” On Google+ I found a lot of posts from newspapers and individuals talking about the NSA surveillance scandal, PRISM, and how sales of 1984 have skyrocketed since news of the government spying broke out in the media. Apparently 1984 is still very relevant to today since people are actively talking about it, and more people are reading it with all of the concerns about big government.

Formal Reviews
I searched for reviews on the library webpage. There were several, but one I thought that was really relevant to digital culture was countering another reviewer’s claims that Orwell was not a genius. In his “Homage to George Orwell” published in the Midwest Quarterly, Peter Firchow writes, “All of his work, let me repeat, even including some minor, transitory pieces like reviews, is still in print, and his fiction and major essays a, along with much of his journalism, have been translated into just about all of the major Western languages.” He cites the availability and circulation of Orwell’s texts as a sign of Orwell’s genius as a writer. This reminded me of today where the mass circulation of someone’s words and writings can be so common that it would not necessarily distinguish them as a genius. But then again all of Orwell’s writings were published into print, and many of them are available online. One of the things that Firchow thinks is characteristic of Orwell’s literature is the tendency to create an environment that exists in the real world but to not have many specific cultural or other references to that place. In this way, Orwell creates a timelessness and a situation that everyone can place themselves in. He does this is 1984 too, where you know the main character is in England, but the character could really be in any dystopian city or country. It makes the story very applicable and powerful that way.

Informal Reviews
One review I particularly enjoyed on Goodreads gave a synopsis of the book through a completely modern lens. The reviewer says, “In George Orwell's 1984, Winston Smith is an open source developer who writes his code offline because his ISP has installed packet sniffers that are regulated by the government under the Patriot Act. It's really for his own protection, though. From, like, terrorists and DVD pirates and stuff. Like every good American, he drinks Coca-Cola and his processed food has desensitized his palate to all but four flavors: (sweet, salty-so-that-you-will-drink-more-coca-cola, sweet, and Cooler Ranch!(tm)). His benevolent overlords have provided him with some war happening somewhere for some reason so that he, and the rest of the population, can be sure that the government is really in his best interests.” This really brought the story home for me. It is obvious that 1984 can be compared to our day, but I think review is a creative way to analyze the story in today’s context and to provide social commentary.

Multimedia
A lot of media has been created about 1984. I searched tried searching for George Orwell 1984+digital culture, but I didn’t get the greatest results, so I simplified my search to 1984. I found a lot of remix images of 1984 themes and today’s politics like this picture.



 To be continued . . .

Exploring Citizen Journalism with Dan Gillmor’s We the Media

I shared this post on my Google+ account:

I've been trying to figure out what's happening with modern journalism--it seems like an article shared on Facebook gets more credit than it should without examining the source. I'm starting Dan Gillmor's book (We the Media) to start sorting through #citizenjournalism .  #amreading 
I got this book recommendation after expressing an interest in citizen journalism. I want to look at what kind of journalism and news is most valuable to people, or perhaps where they get their news. What makes a source credible?

Preview

From taking a brief preview of the book, I can see that Gillmor covers a wide range of subjects. Just from browsing I’ve seen blogs, talk radio, SMS, file sharing, podcasts, photography, and wikis as sources of information, as well as several others. Gillmor introduces his topic by talking about how the public both fact checks and adds to the professional media—people become both producers and consumers of news. Gillmor seems to take an overall positive view of grassroots journalism, though he has cautionary sections.

Marshall McLuhan's Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man and Digital Culture Participants


I am reading McLuhan's Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man to hopefully understand more about different types of media. I'm told that this book has been discussed a lot through the years (despite being dated - it was published in 1964), and it proposes that media itself, not its content, should be the focus of study. Since we've been talking about curation and I've been looking into the idea of "the man behind the post," I'm hoping I'll get some more ideas and viewpoints from reading this.

Preview
No pictures in 396 pages of content (but at least I can turn to page 394...). Other than that quick observation, I think McLuhan's going to really focus on his idea that media is what changes society and not the content it produces/supplies. It's broken into Part I and Part II, with Part I introducing his ideas, but Part II focusing on different types of media and the power of the "written word." There's a lot of metaphors - something about a light bulb and "hot media" vs "cold media."